nuciluc Posted January 28, 2014 Share Posted January 28, 2014 I have a XVM mirror and I found that WG stats very often send damage_dealt=0 as tank results and calculateWN8 procedure crashes. if you think that updated stats are better than partial stats, consider to rollback to WN6 (even on userInfo tab) sorry for my English, but I don't know Russian @ Quote Link to comment Short link Share on other sites More sharing options...
TornadoCat Posted January 28, 2014 Share Posted January 28, 2014 (edited) @nuciluc, the WN6 was not removed from config.Macro {{wn}} was replaced by {{wn6}} and {{wn8}}, {{xwn}} - by {{xwn6}} and {{xwn8}} Edited January 28, 2014 by Metallist95 1 @ Quote Link to comment Short link Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuciluc Posted January 28, 2014 Author Share Posted January 28, 2014 (edited) yes I know.. but in userInfo only WN8 is displayed. and I was refering on server-side: WN8 calculation crashes update procedures for WG blank data (often damage_dealt=0 on all tanks) Edited January 28, 2014 by nuciluc @ Quote Link to comment Short link Share on other sites More sharing options...
TornadoCat Posted January 28, 2014 Share Posted January 28, 2014 @nuciluc, sorry, but in userinfo we can't change shown rating 1 @ Quote Link to comment Short link Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuciluc Posted January 30, 2014 Author Share Posted January 30, 2014 http://code.google.com/p/wot-xvm/source/browse/trunk/src/xvm/src/xvm/profile/components/TechniqueStatisticTab.as#360 I'm not able to compile flash parts of XVM I just modified python part (constants.py) I don't think that WG will fix tanks statistics soon and I think that I should be better rollback to WN6 and temporarily shut down WN8 calculation @ Quote Link to comment Short link Share on other sites More sharing options...
seriych Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 @nuciluc, WG stats very often send damage_dealt=0 as tank results and calculateWN8 procedure crashes Calculation WN8 not uses damage_dealt by tank, only number of battles by tank. @ Quote Link to comment Short link Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuciluc Posted January 31, 2014 Author Share Posted January 31, 2014 (edited) uhm.. you are right.. so.. how update procedure crashes with this error? TypeError: Cannot read property 'dmg' of undefined I'm trying to debug without success.. I will continue.. EDIT: found.. line 500 exp = tanksExpected[tanksList[tankId].name] || { dmg: 0, spot: 0, frg: 0, def: 0, win: 0 }; I did not have the "or" condition.. now.. what tanks are missing in tank-expected.js ? I tried to verify manually.. but there are 360~ tanks.. Edited January 31, 2014 by nuciluc @ Quote Link to comment Short link Share on other sites More sharing options...
seriych Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 how update procedure crashes with this error? I do not know. I just said that the damage on the tank does not take part in the calculations. I do not know how to work with the api.But I can say, that wot-news.com admin several times (at last two weeks) collect for me full statistic by RU cluster without any problems. @ Quote Link to comment Short link Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuciluc Posted January 31, 2014 Author Share Posted January 31, 2014 I'm using iBat nodejs proxy code.. so if I will find a solution, I will share there and I hope it can help fix XVM DB issues.. some players have WN8 = 0 and I do not understand why @ Quote Link to comment Short link Share on other sites More sharing options...
seriych Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 (edited) some players have WN8 = 0 and I do not understand why In XVM? Because iBat uses old expected tank table without some tanks. Now as I know he must use last table with all tanks Edited January 31, 2014 by seriych @ Quote Link to comment Short link Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuciluc Posted February 1, 2014 Author Share Posted February 1, 2014 (edited) is v14 table the correct one? Edited February 1, 2014 by nuciluc @ Quote Link to comment Short link Share on other sites More sharing options...
seriych Posted February 1, 2014 Share Posted February 1, 2014 is v14 table the correct one? yes @ Quote Link to comment Short link Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.