[[WN6, WN7 рейтинг]]

Difference between WN7 vs. W6 is for Average tank lvl (TIER):
WN6: -60*(6-MIN(TIER,6))
WN7: -[(5 - MIN(TIER,5))*125] / [1 + e^( ( TIER - (GAMESPLAYED/220)^(3/TIER) )*1.5 )]

 

IF Average tank lvl (TIER) always >=6  then =======> WN6=WN7

[[WN6, WN7 рейтинг]]

Question:

 

How is calculated WN7 (+2 SPG) ?  Please write formula

[[WN6, WN7 рейтинг]]

Is possible change WN6 ---> WN7 in http://wot-news.com/stat/calc/en/ru  ?

[[WN6, WN7 рейтинг]]

Apparently he made a mistake here.

He has a slightly different formula in his original topic: http://forum.worldoftanks.com/index.php?/topic/184017-wn7-actual-statistically-sound-efficiency-formula/page__p__3134282#entry3134282

WN7 formula:

(1240-1040/(MIN(TIER,6))^0.164)*FRAGS

+DAMAGE*530/(184*e^(0.24*TIER)+130)

+SPOT*125*MIN(TIER, 3)/3

+MIN(DEF,2.2)*100

+((185/(0.17+e^((WINRATE-35)*-0.134)))-500)*0.45

-[(5 - MIN(TIER,5))*125] / [1 + e^( ( TIER - (GAMESPLAYED/220)^(3/TIER) )*1.5 )]

Ok. Now. 

Conclusions: 

rebalanced penalty part formula WN7... especially for players with low number of battles. For >1000 and more it doesn't matter.

But WN7 penalty is bigger than WN6.

Penalty part formula doesn't matter for players with Average tank level >5 for WN7 ... and >6 for WN6.

 

[[WN6, WN7 рейтинг]]

Try ((5-MIN(TIER;5))*125)/(1+EXP((TIER-(BATTLES/220)^(3/TIER))*1,5))

by author Praetor77 was originally:    -5 - MIN(TIER,5))*125] / [1 + e^( ( TIER - (GAMESPLAYED/220)^(3/TIER) )*1.5 )

 

I wrote in excel like in graphics:  ((-5-MIN(TIER;5))*125)/(1+EXP((TIER-(BATTLES/220)^(3/TIER))*1,5))

[[WN6, WN7 рейтинг]]

Please explain last part formula ... It is penalty for playing low tiers? is written correct?

 

WN6: -60*(6-MIN(TIER,6))

WN7: ((-5-(MIN(TIER;5)))*125)/(1+EXP((TIER-(Battles/220)^(3/TIER))*1,5))    _copy from excel

[[WN6, WN7 рейтинг]]

P.S.I apologize for mistake. Analisys shoud be between WN7(WN6) vs. newEFF

 

 

 

 

 

 

New "efficiency rating" formula:
DAMAGE * (10 / (TIER + 2)) * (0.21 + 3*TIER / 100)
FRAGS * 250 +
SPOT * 150 +
log(CAP + 1,1.732) +
DEF * 150;

 

WN7 formula:
(1240-1040/(MIN(TIER,6))^0.164)*FRAGS
+DAMAGE*530/(184*e^(0.24*TIER)+130)
+SPOT*125*MIN(TIER, 3)/3
+MIN(DEF,2.2)*100
+((185/(0.17+e^((WINRATE-35)*-0.134)))-500)*0.45
-5 - MIN(TIER,5))*125] / [1 + EXP( ( TIER - (GAMESPLAYED/220)^(3/TIER) )*1.5 )]

 

My conclusions to WN7(WN6) vs. newEFF  (DMG part formula):

* changes dependent on the DMG rebalanced from  tiers (WN7(WN6) vs. newEFF)
* bonus part of WN7 formula (DMG part)  for tiers: 1 to 7 ... higher tiers which generate more dmg --> value of part of WN7 formula (DMG part) is markedly cuted vs. newEFF